Royal Blood

Royal Blood – Royal Blood: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Royal Blood by Royal Blood
Released August 22, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Royal Blood

Royal Blood

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 9 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval67%6 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 56 to 80.

By the numbers: 6 of 9 critics liked it.

020406080100Pitchfork: 56Mojo: 60The Guardian: 60Uncut: 80Q: 80NME: 80The Telegraph: 80DIY: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 73
The gist
Uncut via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2014
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2014
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 8/10 80 2014 “It’s all in the details. There’s a moment about halfway through Royal Blood’s self-titled debut towards the end of the creepy ‘Blood Hands’ when, rather than his usual skin-pounding assault,…”
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick 4/5 80
DIY via Wikipediaby Stephen Ackroyd 4/5 80 2014 “When it comes to noise they’re surfing a soundwave straight out of the hellmouth.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Scott Kerr 4/5 80
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2014
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Harriet Gibsone 3/5 60 2014 “The heavy and hefty sound of Mike Kerr and Ben Thatcher is enough to crown them kings of commercial rock, writes Harriet Gibsone”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 5.6/10 56 2014 “This Brighton bass-and-drums duo have swiftly become the most universally deified emergent UK rock band since the Arctic Monkeys first thawed out eight years ago. But by using their muscular…”

More from Royal Blood

See all Royal Blood albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply