9 Dead Alive

Rodrigo y Gabriela – 9 Dead Alive: B-Side Breakdown 68 (D+) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for 9 Dead Alive by Rodrigo y Gabriela
Released April 25, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Rodrigo y Gabriela

9 Dead Alive

68
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 5 critics · 40% approval
B-Side Breakdown68Grade: D+
Approval40%2 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give 9 Dead Alive an early B-Side Breakdown of 68 (D+), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Rodrigo y Gabriela's best-reviewed album here since 11:11 (2009).

020406080100NME: 50The Guardian: 60musicOMH: 70AllMusic: 80Consequence: 81 Breakdown 68
The gist
Consequence via Wikipediaby Kristofer Lenz B- 81 2014 “Electrifying guitar duo Rodrigo y Gabriela return to form on latest LP”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 4/5 80 2014
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Laurence Day 3.5/5 70 2014 “Famed for their dextrous digits and finger-tut finicky fret freneticisms, Mexican twosome Rodrigo y Gabriela are two of the world's most impressive”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Robin Denselow 3/5 60 2014 “Rodrigo y Gabriela return with an album that goes back to basics for them musically, while paying tribute to an intriguing selection of historical figures, writes Robin Denselow”
NME via Wikipediaby Jeremy Allen 5/10 50

More from Rodrigo y Gabriela

See all Rodrigo y Gabriela albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply