Critics give The Execution of All Things a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 85.
The verdict on The Execution of All Things
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 85 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 Q
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Rilo Kiley's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of More Adventurous (73).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner | A- | 85 | 2002 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2003 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Sara Lovejoy | 8/10 | 80 | 2003 | “The single, with the same title as the album, is out this week, but blimey, does this album pack a smiley punch! Saddle Creek will oneday take over…” |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2003 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Stuart Muirhead | 4/5 | 80 | 2002 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Kevin Bronson | 3/4 | 75 | 2002 | “*** ENRIQUE IGLESIAS "Quizas" Universal Latino The music favored by Enrique Iglesias on million-selling album after million-selling album is syrupy and decadent, melodramatic and insubstantial.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Chris Dahlen | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2003 | “It's always great to hear a band known for their so-so records suddenly make one where everything clicks. Rilo …” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Kenyon Hopkin | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2003 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Execution of All Things in Rilo Kiley's catalog
How these critics usually treat Rilo Kiley
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 24 points below on Rilo Kiley's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Rilo Kiley's other albums (3).
More from Rilo Kiley
← Earlier Take Offs and Landings (2001)Later → More Adventurous (2004)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2002
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply