Critics give What the World Needs Now… a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.
The verdict on What the World Needs Now…
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 9 liked it.
- Highest 80 Q, Mojo and Louder
- Outlier 40 Drowned in Sound, 28 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #4 of Public Image Ltd.'s 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Nick Hasted | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Lydon’s return rolls on…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Dan Weiss | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: September 04, 2015Label: PiL Official“Lucky you,” began John Lydon’s radio announcer-like intro to Public Image Ltd.’s” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Matthew Horton | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “The way Jon McClure tells it, it took a realisation that no one really gave a monkey’s about [a]Reverend & The Makers[/a]’ music – particularly inside the M25 – to…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Masters | 6.8/10 | 68 | 2015 | “Public Image Ltd.'s second reunion album is solid not because of the songs, but because John Lydon is their singer. At their best, PiL construct sturdy grooves and momentum-building loops…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 4/10 | 40 | 2015 | “What The World Needs… is solid proof that reformations never sound good on record” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
What the World Needs Now… in Public Image Ltd.'s catalog
How these critics usually treat Public Image Ltd.
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Public Image Ltd.'s other albums (5).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Public Image Ltd.'s other albums (9).
- Uncut About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Public Image Ltd.'s other albums (4).
- Mojo About usual for them12 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on Public Image Ltd.'s other albums (4).
More from Public Image Ltd.
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply