Platinum

Miranda Lambert – Platinum: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Platinum by Miranda Lambert
Released June 2, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Miranda Lambert

Platinum

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 7 critics · 71% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval71%5 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The third best-reviewed album of 2014 we've tracked.

020406080100Spin: 70PopMatters: 70Rolling Stone: 80The Guardian: 80Los Angeles Times: 88AllMusic: 90Entertainment Weekly: 95 Breakdown 82
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia A 95
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 “Miranda Lambert waits until she’s 12 songs into her new album to uncork the kind of aggression that's helped her become one of the biggest stars in country music.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Check out our album review of Artist's Platinum on Rolling Stone.com.”
The Guardian via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Spin via Wikipedia 7/10 70 “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: June 03, 2014Label: RCA NashvilleTime has a way of creeping up on us. Miranda Lambert knows this well. She's 30, which”
PopMatters via Wikipedia 7/10 70 “Since beginning her career with one of the industry’s most artificial jump starts — getting noticed on a talent competition reality show — Miranda Lambert”

More from Miranda Lambert

See all Miranda Lambert albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply