Critics give Living Thing a B-Side Breakdown of 68 (D+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 85.
The verdict on Living Thing
4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 85 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 50 Slant and NME
- Career Tied for #3 of Peter Bjorn and John's 4 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B | 85 | 2009 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | “Two years ago, this Swedish trio scored an international smash with "Young Folks," an indie-pop sleeper so relentlessly upbeat that everyone from Kanye” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| Blender via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Chris Catchpole | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “It lacks the eclecticism that made 2006's Writer's Block so appealing, says Chris Catchpole” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 5.5/10 | 55 | 2009 | “The Swedish trio follows its newfound pop success with more pronounced nods to left-field and international influences.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Steve Erickson | 2.5/5 | 50 | Nov 7, 2026 | “Reviews of the latest music, as well as lists and interviews with your favorite musicians, producers, and more.” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 5/10 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Living Thing in Peter Bjorn and John's catalog
How these critics usually treat Peter Bjorn and John
- Pitchfork About usual for them14 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Peter Bjorn and John's other albums (3).
More from Peter Bjorn and John
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply