Early reviews. Critics give Who Am I? an early B-Side Breakdown of 63 (Mixed Bag), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Who Am I?
Critics split on this one: scores run from 40 (Rolling Stone and 1 other) to 80 (NME and 1 other).
- Highest 80 NME and Dork
- Lowest 40 Rolling Stone and The Independent
- Career #2 of Pale Waves's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Pale Waves's best-reviewed album here since My Mind Makes Noises (2018).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Personal awakenings drive the Manchester group's second album, which was borne out of hardship that they never shy away from” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Stephen Ackroyd | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Who Am I? by Pale Waves · released 12th February 2021 · via Dirty Hit Records · 22 tracks · album profile · plus 20 related Dork coverage items.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Jay Singh | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “Pale Waves strive towards finding themselves on Who Am I?” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Alex Cabré | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “You get the sense they’re still not quite certain who or what they want to be. But they’re definitely headed in the right direction.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ashley Bardhan | 6.2/10 | 62 | 2021 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | 2021 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Rachel Brodsky | 2/5 | 40 | 2021 | “On their second album, Pale Waves continue to wear their influences on their sleeves, while Django Django offer some much-needed illumination” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Pale Waves
More Electronic from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply