Critics give My Mind Makes Noises a B-Side Breakdown of 69 (D+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
The verdict on My Mind Makes Noises
Critics split on this one: 4 of 8 liked it.
- Outlier 100 Dork, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 40 The Independent and The Guardian
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Pale Waves's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Who Am I? (63).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dork via Wikipediaby Stephen Ackroyd | 5/5 | 100 | 2018 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Sean Ward | 8/10 | 80 | 2018 | “Pale Waves’ presence may be gloomy, but their songwriting and ambition could not be brighter” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “The Manchester band, fronted by Heather Baron-Gracie, moves from cult concern to the big leagues with an impressive, deft debut” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Rachel Finn | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “It’s clear this is a band keen to subvert your expectations.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ian Gormely | 7/10 | 70 | 2018 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 2/5 | 40 | 2018 | “On their debut album, Pale Waves sound too close to their label mates The 1975, while Paul Weller offers an interesting, if not transcendent, new addition to his canon” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | 2018 | “The super-hyped Manchester quartet have some nice melodic touches, but can’t yet craft songs – and you’ll need to be a heartsick emo teenager to endure the lyrics” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Pale Waves
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply