Ocean Eyes

Owl City – Ocean Eyes: B-Side Breakdown 57 (F) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ocean Eyes by Owl City
Released January 1, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Owl City

Ocean Eyes

57
B-Side BreakdownGrade F · 9 critics · 22% approval
B-Side Breakdown57Grade: F
Approval22%2 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 38 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 88.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Owl City's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Midsummer Station (57). Scores ran from 30 (Clash) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100Clash: 30The Guardian: 40Rolling Stone: 40Spin: 50AllMusic: 50Alternative Press: 60The A.V. Club: 71Q: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88 Breakdown 57
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz B+ 88
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Michaelangelo Matos C- 71
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Spin via Wikipediaby Dan Cook 5/10 50 “The third album from MySpace phenom Owl City, a.k.a., Adam Young, is pristine pop electronica: synths and strings meld seamlessly into dreamy, summery”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andrew Leahey 2.5/5 50
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann 2/5 40 “Owl City's album is like Um Bongo, says Michael Hann – sickly sweet and hard to stomach”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard 2/5 40
Clash via Wikipediaby Kevin Angel 3/10 30 “Despite selling nearly two million copies of his single ‘Fireflies’ and making it onto the BBC’s Sound of 2010 long list, Owl City’s major label debut ‘Ocean Eyes’ is a…”

More from Owl City

See all Owl City albums ranked

More Pop from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply