Early reviews. Critics give Dying of Everything an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Dying of Everything
Most critics loved it: 4 of 5 liked it.
- Highest 91 Sonic Perspectives
- Outlier 60 Kerrang!, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Obituary's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Inked in Blood (80).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonic Perspectivesby Jonathan Smith | 9.1/10 | 91 | 2023 | “A new laboratory of lethal germs has been opened. Opinions may vary as to which subset of American death metal is the sickest, with a convincing case being made that…” |
| Noizzeby Nathaniel Maure | 9/10 | 90 | 2023 | “Raw, unbridled emotion with a noticeably hectic and barbaric approach; death metal legends Obituary bring it all and more on their 11th release to date, Dying of Everything.” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Chris Chantler | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Distorted Soundby Elliot Leaver | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Elliot Leaver reviews the new album from death metal legends Obituary!” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Dan Slessor | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “Obituary once again show us how this death metal thing is done…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Dying of Everything in Obituary's catalog
More from Obituary
More Metal & Punk from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply