No Name

Jack White – No Name: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for No Name by Jack White
Released July 19, 2024
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Jack White

No Name

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 10 critics · 90% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval90%9 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 12 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.

By the numbers: Jack White's best-reviewed album here since Blunderbuss (2012). 9 of 10 critics liked it, with Exclaim! the lone holdout at 70.

020406080100Exclaim!: 70Pitchfork: 76Rolling Stone: 80The Line of Best Fit: 80Mojo: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80Uncut: 90Paste: 90musicOMH: 90 Breakdown 82
Uncut via Wikipediaby Peter Watts 9/10 90
Paste via Wikipediaby Matt Mitchell 9.0/10 90
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ross Horton 4.5/5 90
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan 4/5 80
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Noah Barker 8/10 80
Mojo via Wikipediaby John Mulvey 4/5 80
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Evan Rytlewski 7.6/10 76
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alex Hudson 7/10 70

More from Jack White

See all Jack White albums ranked

More Rock from around 2024

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply