New Eyes

Clean Bandit – New Eyes: B-Side Breakdown 57 (F) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for New Eyes by Clean Bandit
Released May 12, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Clean Bandit

New Eyes

57
B-Side BreakdownGrade F · 6 critics · 33% approval
B-Side Breakdown57Grade: F
Approval33%2 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 38 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Clean Bandit's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of What Is Love? (53). Scores ran from 30 (Clash) to 80 (musicOMH).

020406080100Clash: 30The Guardian: 40NME: 50AllMusic: 60musicOMH: 80Q: 80 Breakdown 57
The gist
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Laurence Day 4/5 80 2014 “Alongside the au courant balladeer Sam Smith, Clean Bandit are forcing the spotlight to shift north of LDN, towards the blue fens of Cambridgeshire.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries 3/5 60
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 5/10 50 2014 “Clean Bandit’s ‘Rather Be’ – which delivered a fusion of house and classical music when it was released back in January – was a Number One single. It worked because…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 2/5 40 2014 “They think they can save dance music but have no hooks, songs or lyrics – just dodgy string arrangements, writes Alexis Petridis”
Clash via Wikipediaby Joe Zadeh 3/10 30 2014 “Clean Bandit – New Eyes. Magpie production makes for a mess of a debut album…”

More from Clean Bandit

See all Clean Bandit albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply