Early reviews. Critics give Digital Garbage an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (Keeper), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Digital Garbage
6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Exclaim! and musicOMH
- Lowest 70 PopMatters and Rolling Stone
- Career #2 of Mudhoney's 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Vish Khanna | 9/10 | 90 | 2018 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2018 | “It's odd to think that, back in the very early '90s, it was Mudhoney who were the Seattle band most likely to break big. Songs like Touch Me I'm Sick…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.1/10 | 71 | 2018 | “The Seattle scuzz-punk pioneers deliver a grave diagnosis of a festering societal condition.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jordan Penney | 7/10 | 70 | 2018 | “There is a core of characteristics that capture something like a worldview espoused by Mudhoney, and it helps to explain the longevity of their appeal.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2018 | “The grunge vets aren't changing up their stomping, crusty sound and that's a good thing” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Digital Garbage in Mudhoney's catalog
How these critics usually treat Mudhoney
- PopMatters About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Mudhoney's other albums (5).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Mudhoney's other albums (9).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Mudhoney's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them9 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Mudhoney's other albums (5).
More from Mudhoney
← Earlier Vanishing Point (2013)Later → Plastic Eternity (2023)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply