Early reviews. Critics give Kingdoms Disdained an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Kingdoms Disdained
Most critics liked it: 4 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 90 Louder
- Outlier 50 Sputnikmusic, 23 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Morbid Angel's 6 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Morbid Angel's best-reviewed album here since Illud Divinum Insanus (2011).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder via Wikipediaby Dom Lawson | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2017 | “Deathly gods get back to brilliant basics” |
| Metal Temple | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “MORBID ANGEL are back and at it again with "Kingdoms Disdained". If you know Metal then you almost certainly know MORBID ANGEL, but if you don't, it has basically become…” |
| Distorted Sound via Wikipediaby Fraser Wilson | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Fraser Wilson reviews the new album from death metal legends Morbid Angel. Read his review of Kingdoms Disdained here on Distorted Sound!” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Denise Falzon | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy O'Connor | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2017 | “Morbid Angel’s ninth album sets the death metal band back on course. Featuring Trey Azagthoth’s molten solos, the band rediscover what they did well across their career and double down…” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2017 | “Morbid Angel – Kingdoms Disdained review: A return to death metal, but not a consistently exciting one.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Kingdoms Disdained in Morbid Angel's catalog
How these critics usually treat Morbid Angel
- Louder Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Morbid Angel's other albums (3).
More from Morbid Angel
More Metal & Punk from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply