Early reviews. Critics give Venomous Villain an early B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Venomous Villain
3 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Robert Christgau
- Lowest 50 Stylus Magazine
- By the numbers The lowest score of MF DOOM's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 91 | 2005 | |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| RapReviews via Wikipediaby James Corne | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2004 | |
| No Ripcord via Wikipediaby Chris Conti | 7/10 | 70 | 2004 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Nick Sylvester | 6.9/10 | 69 | 2004 | “On the heels of his landmark Madvillain collaboration, underground hip-hop's masked genius, Viktor Vaughn (aka MF Doom, aka King Geedorah, aka Zev Love X), unleashes this sequel to last year's…” |
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Nate De Young | 5/10 | 50 | 2004 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
From B-Side Guys
- More on MF DOOMMid-Day Music Blast: Joe P the MC – “MF boomin”
More from MF DOOM
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply