Fantastic Damage

El-P – Fantastic Damage: B-Side Breakdown 89 (B+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Fantastic Damage by El-P
Released May 14, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
El-P

Fantastic Damage

89
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 8 critics · 88% approval
B-Side Breakdown89Grade: B+
Approval88%7 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Fantastic Damage a B-Side Breakdown of 89 (B+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

The verdict on Fantastic Damage

7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

  • Highest 100 Tiny Mix Tapes
  • Lowest 70 Rolling Stone
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of El-P's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Cancer 4 Cure (83). The third best-reviewed album of 2002 we've tracked.
020406080100Rolling Stone: 70NME: 80Pitchfork: 89Spin: 90AllMusic: 90Stylus Magazine: 95Entertainment Weekly: 95Tiny Mix Tapes: 100 Breakdown 89
The gist
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Gavin Mueller A 95 2003
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Will Hermes A 95 2002
Spin via Wikipediaby Chris Ryan 9/10 90 2002
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Steve Huey 4.5/5 90
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sam Chennault 8.9/10 89 2002 “Back in '97, El-P released Funcrusher Plus with his seminal group Company Flow. The album's tense, hypercreative backdrops laid …”
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kathryn McGuire 3.5/5 70 2002

Fantastic Damage in El-P's catalog

75Fantastic Damage (2002): 8989This oneI’ll Sleep When You’re Dead (2007): 7878Cancer 4 Cure (2012): 83832012
El-P's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every El-P album, ranked

More from El-P

See all El-P albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply