Pagans in Vegas

Metric – Pagans in Vegas: B-Side Breakdown 66 (D) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Pagans in Vegas by Metric
Released September 18, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Metric

Pagans in Vegas

66
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 10 critics · 30% approval
B-Side Breakdown66Grade: D
Approval30%3 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Critics give Pagans in Vegas a B-Side Breakdown of 66 (D), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 45 to 88.

The verdict on Pagans in Vegas

Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 10 liked it.

020406080100Under the Radar: 45XS Noize: 50musicOMH: 60Pitchfork: 60Rolling Stone: 60PopMatters: 70AllMusic: 70Consequence: 75Exclaim!: 80The A.V. Club: 88 Breakdown 66
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Saloni Gajjar B+ 88 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Luke-Julius Frenette 8/10 80 2015
Consequence via Wikipediaby Adam Kivel C 75 2015 “The band that set the template for today's indie pop now sounds stuck in the past.”
PopMattersby Colin Fitzgerald 7/10 70 2015 “Metric have always been one of the loudest and proudest indie pop bands of their generation, but lacking the enthusiasm for their long-utilized arena rock and”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 3.5/5 70
musicOMHby John Murphy 3/5 60 2015 “Bam shika bam shika boom boom bom. Sha wang sha wang boom, sha wang sha wang boom!". On paper, it may read like the nonsensical ramblings of the most”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zoe Camp 6.0/10 60 2015 “Pagans in Vegas is Metric's slinkiest, slickest album to date. It deepens the new-wave dalliances of its predecessor (2012's Synthetica), exploring the binary between authenticity and artificiality with zero subtlety.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan 3/5 60 2015 “Check out our album review of Artist's Pagans in Vegas on Rolling Stone.com.”
XS Noizeby Tommy Trujillo 5/10 50 2015
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Nina Corcoran 4.5/10 45 2015 “Old World Underground, Where Are You Now? aged with such grace that it still prompts the question: Why weren't Metric pulled into the popular ring when it debuted in 2003?…”

Pagans in Vegas in Metric's catalog

75Old World Underground, Where Are You Now? (2003): 7373Synthetica (2012): 7575Pagans in Vegas (2015): 6666This oneFormentera (2022): 737320032022
Metric's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Metric album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Metric

  • Pitchfork About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Metric's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Metric's other albums (3).

More from Metric

See all Metric albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply