Early reviews. Critics give Daemon an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Daemon
Most critics loved it: 4 of 5 liked it.
- Highest 91 Consequence
- Outlier 60 Sputnikmusic, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Mayhem's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Mayhem's best-reviewed album here since Grand Declaration of War (2000).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Jon Hadusek | A- | 91 | 2019 | “The pioneering Norwegian black metal band's sixth full-length album is a definitive return to form.” |
| Metal Temple | 9/10 | 90 | 2019 | “There has never been a band that has been rifer with controversy than MAYHEM. Undoubtedly, there were times in the long-spanning run of MAYHEM that its members were sure all…” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Dean Brown | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2019 | “Oslo’s second-wave black metal forefathers, Mayhem, are still defining the state of the art” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Jack Kelleher | 8/10 | 80 | 2019 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Simon K | 3.0/5 | 60 | “Mayhem – Daemon review: 'Daemon' is a solid dose of black metal, and not much else.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Daemon in Mayhem's catalog
More from Mayhem
← Earlier Esoteric Warfare (2014)Later → Liturgy of Death (2026)
More Metal & Punk from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply