Early reviews. Critics give The Blue Notebooks an early B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on The Blue Notebooks
6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 AllMusic
- Lowest 80 Uncut, Tiny Mix Tapes and PopMatters
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Max Richter's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Sleep (79). The second best-reviewed Electronic album of 2004 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Pytlik | 8.7/10 | 87 | 2004 | |
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Ron Schepper | B- | 81 | 2004 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Piers Martin | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “In some regards, the acceptance of Fat Cat Records' new classical offshoot, 130701 says a lot about modern listeners coming full-circle with their tastes in music. After exposing electronic music…” | |
| PopMatters | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Neo-classical composer and electronic musician Max Richter's recording career got off to a rough start. His first album memoryhouse was met with weak sales” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Blue Notebooks in Max Richter's catalog
How these critics usually treat Max Richter
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Max Richter's other albums (3).
More from Max Richter
More Electronic from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply