In a Landscape

Max Richter – In a Landscape: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for In a Landscape by Max Richter
Released September 6, 2024
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Max Richter

In a Landscape

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 8 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give In a Landscape an early B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on In a Landscape

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100Pitchfork: 73Clash: 80Spin: 81 Breakdown 78
The gist
Spin via Wikipediaby David Harris B- 81 2024 “Composer Max Richter seeks connection on his ninth record, 'In a Landscape.”
Clash via Wikipediaby Tom Kingsley 8/10 80 2024 “Someone once told me that they would like to inject the music of Max Richter into their veins. It’s an apt metaphor: Richter’s music, slow, simple and”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Vanessa Ague 7.3/10 73 2024

In a Landscape in Max Richter's catalog

75Memoryhouse (2002): 7777The Blue Notebooks (2004): 8585Sleep (2015): 7979In a Landscape (2024): 7878This one2002
Max Richter's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Max Richter album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Max Richter

  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual8 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Max Richter's other albums (3).

More from Max Richter

See all Max Richter albums ranked

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply