Early reviews. Critics give No Said Date an early B-Side Breakdown of 87 (B+), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: The fourth best-reviewed album of 2004 we've tracked. All 5 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from AllMusic.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | “Within the last few months, I've attempted to review as many new releases by members of the famous Wu-Tang Clan. Since its inception in 1994, Wu-Tang Clan has been an…” | |
| RapReviews via Wikipediaby James Corne | 9/10 | 90 | 2004 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2004 | “The only remaining Wu-Tang member to not have released a solo album finally gets free from prison and one-ups his Clan-mates' recent outings.” |
| AllHipHop via Wikipediaby Grouchy Greg Watkins | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | “Artist: Masta KillaTitle: No Said DateRating: 4 StarsReviewed by: Matt Barone Maintaining a level of obscurity amongst his more outgoing Wu-Tang Clan” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stewart Mason | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply