Critics give Mark Hollis a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
The verdict on Mark Hollis
Critics split on this one: 8 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 100 Sputnikmusic
- Outlier 40 The Independent, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Reputation 70 81 at release, then five or more years later
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Benjamin Kuettel | 5/5 | 100 | 1998 | “Mark Hollis – Mark Hollis review: The final artistic statement from the Talk Talk frontman follows his band’s legacy by deconstructing what made it work, and to that end succeeds…” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | A | 95 | 2019 | “The late artist leaves behind a quiet and profound masterpiece.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jess Harvell | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2011 | “These magnificent reissues of English art-rock innovators Talk Talk's 1991 final record Laughing Stock and their reclusive leader Mark Hollis' 1998 self-titled solo album are presented on immaculate vinyl. They…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jason Ankeny | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipediaby David Stubbs | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Jim Irvin | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Paul Moody | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Bennun | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Q via Wikipediaby Anthony Thornton | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Angela Lewis | 2/5 | 40 | 1998 | “Mark Hollis: Mark Hollis (Polydor, below).” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Rock from around 1998
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply