Early reviews. Critics give She Walks in Beauty an early B-Side Breakdown of 83 (Keeper), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on She Walks in Beauty
So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 90 musicOMH
- Lowest 80 Rolling Stone Australia and PopMatters
- Career #3 of Marianne Faithfull's 10 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Marianne Faithfull's best-reviewed album here since Negative Capability (2018).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMHby Matt Cotsell | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2021 | “Recovered from covid and calling in Shelley, Wordsworth and Byron, the icon embellishes her legend” |
| Rolling Stone Australiaby Poppy Reid | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Her collaborative spoken-word album with the Bad Seeds’ Warren Ellis finds her reciting verses by Keats, Shelley, and Lord Byron, and finding new depth in the words.” |
| PopMattersby Peter Piatkowski | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | “Marianne Faithfull's She Walks in Beauty captures the sad, reflective mood of the world. It's an apt period to a very long and moving sentence.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
She Walks in Beauty in Marianne Faithfull's catalog
How these critics usually treat Marianne Faithfull
- musicOMH About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Marianne Faithfull's other albums (3).
More from Marianne Faithfull
More Electronic from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply