Early reviews. Critics give Give My Love to London an early B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Give My Love to London
5 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 80 Uncut, Pitchfork, Record Collector and 2 more
- Outlier 60 The Guardian, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career Tied for #3 of Marianne Faithfull's 7 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Terry Staunton | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen M. Deusner | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2014 | “Marianne Faithfull's latest is her best and most daring album of this century, featuring some of her heaviest and most haunting performances. Roger Waters, Nick Cave, Anna Calvi, Portishead's Adrian…” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “When she undertakes her world tour to mark 50 years since the release of her first single, As Tears Go By, Marianne Faithfull will enjoy the rare luxury” |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | “With guest turns from Anna Calvi and Ed Harcourt, Faithfull’s new album sees the veteran singer back on form, writes Maddy Costa” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Marianne Faithfull
← Earlier Horses and High Heels (2010)Later → Negative Capability (2018)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply