Critics give The Wild Hunt a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on The Wild Hunt
8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 90 Consequence
- Lowest 60 Q and NME
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Kristian Matsson's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of There’s No Leaving Now (74). The fifth best-reviewed Folk, Country & Americana album of 2010 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Philip Cosores | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2010 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Spencer Kornhaber | B+ | 88 | 2010 | “The Tallest Man On Earth: The Wild Hunt” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen M. Deusner | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2010 | “Swedish troubadour Kristian Matsson returns as a more confident vocalist and a more nuanced and effective songwriter.” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Amanda Petrusich | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “For folk singers, having a peculiar, gravelly voice and toting around an acoustic guitar can feel like an albatross: Few folks fare well in comparison to” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Swedish folkie Kristian Matsson, aka The Tallest Man On Earth, has managed to effect an eerily persuasive impression of the young Bob Dylan on this second album.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Will Dean | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “It's one for the 50-quid blokes, but The Wild Hunt is joy none the less, says Will Dean” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby K. Ross Hoffman | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kristian Matsson
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply