Krushers of the World

Kreator – Krushers of the World: B-Side Breakdown 91 (A-) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Krushers of the World by Kreator
Released January 16, 2026
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Kreator

Krushers of the World

91
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 4 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown91Grade: A-
Approval100%4 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 4 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 4 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Kreator's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Hate Über Alles (57). All 4 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 89, from Sonic Perspectives.

020406080100Sonic Perspectives: 89Distorted Sound: 90Dead Rhetoric: 90Metal Planet Music: 95 Breakdown 91
The gist
Metal Planet Music 9.5/10 95 Jan 8, 2026 “Review by Rick Eaglestone for MPM German thrash titans return with their latest album – the band describe Krushers of the World as a statement, and whilst in part I…”
Distorted Sound 9/10 90 Jan 15, 2026 “Jack Press reviews the new album from German thrash veterans Kreator! Read his review of 'Krushers Of The World' here on Distorted Sound!”
Dead Rhetoric 9/10 90 Jan 10, 2026
Sonic Perspectivesby Jonathan Smith 8.9/10 89 Jan 9, 2026 “Leveling the world, one city at a time. The road that thrash metal has taken since its early 80s inception has been anything but a straightaway track, especially for those…”

More from Kreator

See all Kreator albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2026

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply