Kingwood

Millencolin – Kingwood: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Kingwood by Millencolin
Released March 29, 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Millencolin

Kingwood

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 4 critics · 25% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval25%1 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 4 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Millencolin's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Pennybridge Pioneers (73). Only one of 4 critics liked it: musicOMH, at 90.

020406080100Sputnikmusic: 60PopMatters: 70AllMusic: 70musicOMH: 90 Breakdown 73
The gist
musicOMHby Vik Bansal 4.5/5 90 2005 “Swedish quartet Millencolin might be named after the "melancholy" skateboarding move but there's nothing "sad" about them. A healthy 13-year existence,”
PopMatters 7/10 70 2005 “When you get a lot of discs in the mail each week, publicists often try to get your attention by including press information and background on the band and”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2005
Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia 3/5 60 “Millencolin – Kingwood review”

More from Millencolin

See all Millencolin albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply