Early reviews. Critics give The Epic an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on The Epic
6 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 AllMusic
- Lowest 70 Rolling Stone
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Kamasi Washington's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Heaven and Earth (81).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Seth Colter Walls | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2015 | “Kamasi Washington, a member of the studio band that composed To Pimp a Butterfly, has released a triple-album set that functions as an extravagant love letter to (among other things):…” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby John Lewis | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Louder Than War via Wikipediaby Simon Tucker | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Los Angeles jazz giant, composer, and bandleader Kamasi Washington drops his brilliant debut album, The Epic, via Flying Loyus's boundary-defying Brainfeeder label.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Russell Warfield | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Washington is reaching for the epic on every scale.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby John Fordham | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Los Angeles saxophonist Kamasi Washington aims to bring jazz to the uninitiated with this wild and wonderful musical odyssey” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's The Epic on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kamasi Washington
More Jazz from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply