Critics give Heaven and Earth a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 95.
The verdict on Heaven and Earth
9 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 95 Consequence
- Outlier 60 Rolling Stone, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Kamasi Washington's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Kamasi Washington's best-reviewed album here since The Epic (2015).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michael Roffman | A | 95 | 2018 | “Jazz saxophonist capitalizes on his newfound fame to deliver something truly genius.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Matt Gerardi | A- | 91 | 2018 | “Nine Inch Nails, Kamasi Washington, and more albums to know about this week” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Nate Chinen | 8.8/10 | 88 | 2018 | “The latest from the saxophonist and bandleader is a multi-genre feast of musical ideas, his most sweeping and complete statement yet.” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2018 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Ilana Kaplan | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Also: Kamasi Washington’s ‘Heaven and Earth’, Binker & Moses, and Jack River” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “The statuesque US saxophonist has found his time and it is now: this excellent album connects current politics with the music of the past to create a new vision” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Hank Shteamer | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 | “Kamasi Washington, the most talked-about jazz musician in recent memory, blurs genres on his two-hour-plus new album 'Heaven and Earth.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kamasi Washington
More Jazz from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply