Early reviews. Critics give Volcano an early B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Volcano
4 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Outlier 100 The Independent, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 60 NME and The Guardian
- Career #2 of Jungle's 4 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 5/5 | 100 | 2023 | “Teeming with appearances from acts including Channel Tres and Roots Manuva, Josh Lloyd-Watson and Tom McFarland’s new record no longer sees the pair uneasily centre stage” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Izzy Sigston | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Exploring a whole new sphere of genres, eras and musical styles, it's Jungle at their peak of most progressive yet.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Jungle’s decade-long career has seen the production duo move from much-hyped online phenomenon through to viral slow burners. The group’s 2014 debut may” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Ed Lawson | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “More breezy bops than all-out summer smashes, but nevertheless extremely rich and warm in sound.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “The duo’s fourth album sees them nail down their sound and vibes, but often struggles to do the soul it looks to evoke justice” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Ammar Kalia | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “This confident but formulaic fourth outing from the UK dance duo mixes 70s funk breakbeats, wistful guitar soul and euphoric disco” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Volcano in Jungle's catalog
How these critics usually treat Jungle
- NME Harsher than usual20 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Jungle's other albums (3).
- DIY About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Jungle's other albums (3).
More from Jungle
More R&B & Soul from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply