Early reviews. Critics give Legacy: The Creedence Clearwater Revival Years an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Legacy: The Creedence Clearwater Revival Years
6 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 80 Cult Following, Record Collector, Uncut and 3 more
- Lowest 70 AllMusic
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of John Fogerty's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Blue Moon Swamp (77).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cult Followingby Ewan Gleadow | 4/5 | 80 | Aug 18, 2025 | “Of all the people to bring Legacy: The Creedence Clearwater Revival Years to an audience’s attention, it was Roger Daltrey. The Who frontman performed a cover of Have You Ever…” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 28, 2025 | “On an album choc-a-block with fan favourites and past triumphs, one of the less widely-known tracks is arguably one of the most significant. Porterville” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Michael Bonner | 4/5 | 80 | Aug 13, 2025 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 29, 2025 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Marty Lipp | 8/10 | 80 | Sep 24, 2025 | |
| Louder via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 29, 2025 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 3.5/5 | 70 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Legacy: The Creedence Clearwater Revival Years in John Fogerty's catalog
How these critics usually treat John Fogerty
- AllMusic Harsher than usual10 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on John Fogerty's other albums (4).
More from John Fogerty
More Rock from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply