Wrote a Song For Everyone

John Fogerty – Wrote a Song For Everyone: B-Side Breakdown 63 (D) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Wrote a Song For Everyone by John Fogerty
Released May 13, 2013
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
John Fogerty

Wrote a Song For Everyone

63
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 6 critics · 17% approval
B-Side Breakdown63Grade: D
Approval17%1 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 38 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Record Collector) to 100 (Rolling Stone). John Fogerty's best-reviewed album here since The Blue Ridge Rangers Rides Again (2009).

020406080100Record Collector: 40Chicago Tribune: 50AllMusic: 60Exclaim!: 60PopMatters: 70Rolling Stone: 100 Breakdown 63
The gist
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 5/5 100 “Check out our album review of Artist's Wrote a Song for Everyone on Rolling Stone.com.”
PopMatters 7/10 70 2013 “Wrote a Song for Everyone — the title seems a little quaint at first glance, but when you really stop and think about it, its audacity becomes apparent. For”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Exclaim! via Wikipedia 6/10 60
Chicago Tribune via Wikipedia 2/4 50
Record Collectorby Sue Matiz 2/5 40 2013 “Now, much as John Fogerty deserves all the credit and should be cut even more slack for masterminding the heyday of Creedence Clearwater Revival”

More from John Fogerty

See all John Fogerty albums ranked

More Rock from around 2013

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply