Jarvis

Jarvis Cocker – Jarvis: B-Side Breakdown 79 (Keeper) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Jarvis by Jarvis Cocker
Released November 13, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Jarvis Cocker

Jarvis

79
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Keeper
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Critics give Jarvis a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 62 to 100.

The verdict on Jarvis

7 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

  • Highest 100 musicOMH and The Guardian
  • Lowest 62 Pitchfork
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Jarvis Cocker's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Chansons d’Ennui (75). The fourth best-reviewed Electronic album of 2006 we've tracked.
020406080100Pitchfork: 62Stylus Magazine: 65NME: 70The A.V. Club: 75Rolling Stone: 80Drowned in Sound: 80AllMusic: 80musicOMH: 100The Guardian: 100 Breakdown 79
The gist
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Michael Hubbard 5/5 100 2006 “Jarvis Cocker, hero to a generation, crafter of anthems, wearer of distinctive glasses, wit, podcaster, Radio 4 presenter, talking head, songwriter for”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 5/5 100 2006
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia 8/10 80
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Noel Murray B+ 75 2007
NME via Wikipedia 7/10 70 2006 “It’s no secret that Jarvis Cocker sees himself as an outsider. But sometime around 2003 it got so bad he quit the country. With Pulp over, a war in Iraq…”
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B 65
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 6.2/10 62

More from Jarvis Cocker

See all Jarvis Cocker albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply