Critics give One-Armed Bandit a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 69 to 100.
The verdict on One-Armed Bandit
7 of 8 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 musicOMH and No Ripcord
- Lowest 69 Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Jaga Jazzist's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Starfire (70). The second best-reviewed Electronic album of 2010 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMH via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| No Ripcord via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | “Although I realize the rather premature nature of this statement, it could very well be that with One Armed Bandit, Norway's Jaga Jazzist have produced the album of the…” | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | “It’s unlikely to be coincidence that Jaga Jazzist’s third album ends with the noise of helicopters. This is, after all, a record t” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Monica Castillo | A- | 85 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby B McGhee | 4/5 | 80 | “The first thought I had after firing up Jaga Jazzist’s new album One-Armed Bandit was, “Oh, this is supposed to be a masterpiece.” Somehow, the scent of aspiring mastery I…” | |
| Clash via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “In the wrong hands, jazz-fusion and prog can be dangerous musical fodder, but when undertaken by Norwegian alt-musos Jaga Jazzist, the results can be spectacular.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2010 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brian Howe | 6.9/10 | 69 | 2010 | “The ambitious Norwegian band with a hard-to-define jazz/ post-rock sound returns with another eclectic album.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Jaga Jazzist
More Electronic from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply