In This Light and on This Evening

Editors – In This Light and on This Evening: B-Side Breakdown 61 (D-) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for In This Light and on This Evening by Editors
Released September 10, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Editors

In This Light and on This Evening

61
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 8 critics · 13% approval
B-Side Breakdown61Grade: D-
Approval13%1 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 37 to 80.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 37 (Pitchfork) to 80 (The Guardian). Only one of 8 critics liked it: The Guardian, at 80.

020406080100Pitchfork: 37Slant: 50NME: 50The Independent: 60Spin: 70Drowned in Sound: 70AllMusic: 70The Guardian: 80 Breakdown 61
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2009
Spin via Wikipediaby Josh Modell 3.5/5 70 2010 “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: October 12, 2009Label: FaderOn this third album, Editors expand their sonic vocabulary by supplementing — at times,”
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Dom Gourlay 7/10 70 2009
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 3/5 60 2009
Slant via Wikipediaby Huw Jones 2.5/5 50 2010 “In This Light is inspired by the hustle and bustle of London, and perhaps more so its anxiety and paranoia.”
NME via Wikipedia 5/10 50 2009
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 3.7/10 37

More from Editors

See all Editors albums ranked

More Rock from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply