III

Crystal Castles – III: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for III by Crystal Castles
Released November 7, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Crystal Castles

III

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 90.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 50 (Slant) to 90 (NME).

020406080100Slant: 50The A.V. Club: 75Pitchfork: 80PopMatters: 80The Independent: 80The Guardian: 80Consequence: 80AllMusic: 80NME: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison 9/10 90
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 8.0/10 80 2012 “Crystal Castles songs could once be split into two camps, the "pretty" ones and the "aggressive" ones. (III) is by a large margin the most focused record by the band,…”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Matt James 8/10 80 2012 “Every act of rebellion expresses a nostalgia for innocence and an appeal to the essence of being”
The Independent via Wikipediaby Simon Price 4/5 80 2012
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze 4/5 80 2012 “The most affecting songs on III sound like a band experiencing a very personal kind of misery, writes Tim Jonze”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Dan Pfleegor 4/5 80 2012 “Techo-static grabs you by the throat, then squeezes.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby William Hughes C 75 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Slant via Wikipediaby Jesse Cataldo 2.5/5 50 2012 “Crystal Castles's 'III' is an album of earnest, expansive electronica from a duo few are expecting such sincerity from.”

More Electronic from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply