Critics give The Remote Part a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on The Remote Part
7 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Idlewild's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Idlewild (Idlewild album) (76). The fourth best-reviewed Rock album of 2002 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brian M. Raftery | A- | 91 | 2003 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 9/10 | 90 | 2005 | “Scottish friction, Scottish fiction. Two years on since ‘100 Broken Windows’ sank Indieland under tidal waves of riotous apathy, Idlewild‘s fourth album sticks one up the cynics who expected another…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Andrew Beaujon | B- | 81 | 2003 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Gaylord Fields | 4/5 | 80 | 2003 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby John Donohue | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby MacKenzie Wilson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum | 6.5/10 | 65 | 2002 | “I remember when people thought I was going to be the next Radiohead. From morning to night, I was tailed …” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 3/5 | 60 | 2002 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Remote Part in Idlewild's catalog
More from Idlewild
← Earlier 100 Broken Windows (2000)Later → Make Another World (2007)
More Rock from around 2002
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply