Highly Evolved

The Vines – Highly Evolved: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Highly Evolved by The Vines
Released June 15, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Vines

Highly Evolved

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 10 critics · 80% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval80%8 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 41 to 90.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of The Vines's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Vision Valley (60). Scores ran from 41 (Pitchfork) to 90 (NME).

020406080100Pitchfork: 41Rolling Stone: 60Los Angeles Times: 75Entertainment Weekly: 75Uncut: 80Q: 80The Guardian: 80Blender: 80AllMusic: 80NME: 90 Breakdown 74
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Jason Fox 9/10 90 2005 “What we know: Craig Nicholls is addicted to grass and fast food, has a larynx you could pebble-dash the drive with and, in the right light, could quite easily pass…”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2003
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2003
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2002
Blender via Wikipediaby John Harris 4/5 80 2020 “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Natalie Nichols 3/4 75 2002 “** 1/2 DAVE MATTHEWS BAND "Busted Stuff" RCA Matthews has retreated even further into the sanctuary of his own sound, if that's possible, resulting in a gorgeous sonic flow with…”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Brian M. Raftery C 75
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard 3/5 60
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Chris Dahlen 4.1/10 41

More from The Vines

See all The Vines albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply