Snakes for the Divine

High on Fire – Snakes for the Divine: B-Side Breakdown 80 (B-) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Snakes for the Divine by High on Fire
Released February 23, 2010
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
High on Fire

Snakes for the Divine

80
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 4 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown80Grade: B-
Approval75%3 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Snakes for the Divine an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Snakes for the Divine

So far, 3 of 4 critics liked it.

020406080100Drowned in Sound: 70PopMatters: 80Pitchfork: 80AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 80
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 2010
PopMatters via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tom Breihan 8.0/10 80 2010 “Five albums in and another awesome, absolutely pummeling record of tough, fast stoner metal from Matt Pike and co.”
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner 7/10 70 2010 “Although this doesn’t quite scale the heights of their two previous LPs, Death Is This Communion and Blessed Black Wings, it shouldn’t be thought o…”

More from High on Fire

See all High on Fire albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2010

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply