Early reviews. Critics give Disco4 :: Part I an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Disco4 :: Part I
So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 86 Sputnikmusic
- Lowest 70 The Line of Best Fit
- Career Tied for #2 of Health's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Health's best-reviewed album here since Get Color (2009).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Simon K | 4.3/5 | 86 | 2020 | “HEALTH – DISCO4:: Part I review: No moment of change, with every regret.” |
| Distorted Soundby Gavin Brown | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “Health return with second volume of collaborative songs entitled 'DISCO4 :: PART II' and the results are devastating.” |
| The Line of Best Fitby Kate Crudgington | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | “HEALTH's DISCO::4 Part II is the sound of the disconnected seeking connection” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Disco4 :: Part I in Health's catalog
How these critics usually treat Health
- Sputnikmusic Harsher than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 20 points above on Health's other albums (3).
From B-Side Guys
More from Health
← Earlier Vol. 4 :: Slaves of Fear (2019)Later → Rat Wars (2023)
More Metal & Punk from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply