Critics give Under the Western Freeway a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 96.
The verdict on Under the Western Freeway
7 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 96 Pitchfork in 1997
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career #2 of Grandaddy's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- Reputation 89 76 at release, then five or more years later
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchfork in 1997 via Wikipediaby Jason Josephes | 9.6/10 | 96 | 1997 | |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 91 | 1998 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Wyndham Wallace | 9/10 | 90 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork in 2017 via Wikipediaby Philip Cosores | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2017 | |
| Q via Wikipediaby Niall Doherty | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 8/10 | 80 | 1997 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Nitsuh Abebe | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Keith Harris | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tom Cox | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Under the Western Freeway in Grandaddy's catalog
How these critics usually treat Grandaddy
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Grandaddy's other albums (3).
More from Grandaddy
More Indie & Alternative from around 1997
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply