A+E

Graham Coxon – A+E: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for A+E by Graham Coxon
Released April 2, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Graham Coxon

A+E

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 7 critics · 57% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval57%4 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give A+E an early B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on A+E

4 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Drowned in Sound: 60Pitchfork: 67PopMatters: 70Sputnikmusic: 80The Guardian: 80NME: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Tom Pinnock 9/10 90 2012 “Guitarists over 40 don’t have a great record for recapturing their teenage angst and fury with dignity. Once they hit middle-age, most of them sensibly embrace new avenues – see…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 2012
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Joseph Viney 4/5 80 2012 “Graham Coxon – A+E review: Golden Graham”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Miranda Sawyer 4/5 80 2012 “Graham Coxon talks to Miranda Sawyer about his new album A+E, Blur's Hyde Park Olympics gig and his reaction to last summer's riots”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby AJ Ramirez 7/10 70 2012
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 6.7/10 67 2012
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Billy Hamilton 6/10 60 2012 “Despite the quality of the execution, it’s difficult to shake the sense that A+E has been done before.”

More from Graham Coxon

See all Graham Coxon albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply