Bridges

Gil Scott-Heron – Bridges: B-Side Breakdown 75 (C) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Bridges by Gil Scott-Heron
Released December 1977
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Gil Scott-Heron

Bridges

75
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown75Grade: C
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Bridges an early B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Bridges

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 60AllMusic: 80Robert Christgau: 85 Breakdown 75
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau B 85 2011
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jeff Schwachter 4/5 80 2011
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2011

Bridges in Gil Scott-Heron's catalog

75Pieces of a Man (1971): 8181Winter in America (1974): 8888Bridges (1977): 7575This oneSecrets (1978): 7373Real Eyes (1980): 6767Reflections (1981): 6868I’m New Here (2010): 797919712010
Gil Scott-Heron's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Gil Scott-Heron album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Gil Scott-Heron

  • AllMusic Kinder than usual8 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Gil Scott-Heron's other albums (6).
  • Robert Christgau About usual for them15 points above the other critics here. Usually 16 points above on Gil Scott-Heron's other albums (4).

More from Gil Scott-Heron

See all Gil Scott-Heron albums ranked

More Jazz from around 1977

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply