Early reviews. Critics give No Fences an early B-Side Breakdown of 91 (Heavy Rotation), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on No Fences
So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 100 AllMusic
- Lowest 80 The Rolling Stone Album Guide
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Garth Brooks's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Scarecrow (76).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Alanna Nash | A | 93 | 1990 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Nathan Brackett | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
No Fences in Garth Brooks's catalog
How these critics usually treat Garth Brooks
- AllMusic About usual for them14 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Garth Brooks's other albums (11).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Garth Brooks's other albums (9).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide About usual for them17 points below the other critics here. Usually 16 points below on Garth Brooks's other albums (6).
More from Garth Brooks
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 1990
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply