Critics give One of the Best Yet a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on One of the Best Yet
4 of 8 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Exclaim!
- Lowest 60 NME
- Career #6 of Gang Starr's 6 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Gang Starr's best-reviewed album here since The Ownerz (2003).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Riley Wallace | 9/10 | 90 | 2019 | |
| HipHopDX via Wikipedia | 4.2/5 | 84 | 2019 | “Get your hip hop album reviews, rap and R&B reviews from the best music review website on the web. We have all the latest music reviews from today’s top artists.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | B- | 81 | 2019 | “The New York duo and friends demonstrate why they're revered as old-school legends. Read M.T. Richards' full review.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “Though rapper Guru died in 2010, DJ Premier avoids the usual pitfalls of posthumous releases, deploying neat verses and brilliant production tricks” |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2019 | “Gang Starr, the legendary Brooklyn hip-hop-duo by way of Texas and Boston, has just released an instant true-school hip-hop classic amidst the greatest of” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2019 | “Gang Starr's First Album in 16 Years is a Gift to Old-School Raps Fans.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sheldon Pearce | 6.3/10 | 63 | 2019 | “It’s thrilling to hear them again, but once the glow wears off, there’s a hollowness to this posthumous project, cobbled together from unreleased Guru vocal takes.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Will Lavin | 3/5 | 60 | 2019 | “One of the Best Yet' is a special moment for hip-hop that celebrates life, love and legacy, 30 years after Gang Starr first hit the scene.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Gang Starr
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply