From a Basement on the Hill

Elliott Smith – From a Basement on the Hill: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for From a Basement on the Hill by Elliott Smith
Released October 18, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Elliott Smith

From a Basement on the Hill

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

By the numbers: Elliott Smith's best-reviewed album here since Elliott Smith (1995). The seventh best-reviewed album of 2004 we've tracked.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 70Pitchfork in 2004: 72Q: 80Mojo: 80Pitchfork in 2010: 84NME: 90AllMusic: 90Entertainment Weekly: 91The Guardian: 100 Breakdown 84
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 5/5 100 2004
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne A- 91
NME via Wikipediaby John Mulvey 9/10 90
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4.5/5 90
Pitchfork in 2010 via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene 8.4/10 84 2010
Q via Wikipediaby Steve Lowe 4/5 80 2004
Mojo via Wikipediaby John Harris 4/5 80 2004
Pitchfork in 2004 via Wikipediaby Amanda Petrusich 7.2/10 72 2004 “Almost exactly one year after his death last October, Elliott Smith's posthumous final album features 15 songs, most of which are said to have been fully completed by Smith himself…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kelefa Sanneh 3.5/5 70 2004 “Check out our album review of Artist's From A Basement On The Hill on Rolling Stone.com.”

From B-Side Guys

More from Elliott Smith

See all Elliott Smith albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply