Early reviews. Critics give All I Need an early B-Side Breakdown of 61 (D-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on All I Need
Critics split on this one: 2 of 7 liked it.
- Highest 80 NME and AllMusic
- Outlier 20 Clash, 29 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Foxes's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby John Calvert | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “The days when Britain’s synthpop royalty and androgynous rock-gods conquered the earth is ancient-pop history. Sure we’ve got our Adeles and our Sheerens, but their particular craft is ‘pop’ ,…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Danilo Bortoli | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 | “Call this either a blessing or a curse, but no one sounds like Louisa Allen, the musician better known as Foxes, in this current pop music landscape. In this” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Levy | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2016 | “Check out our album review of Artist's All I Need on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | “The musical and lyrical smarts of the great single Body Talk are not matched by anything on Foxes’ second album” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sarah Sahim | 4.9/10 | 49 | 2016 | “Foxes (aka Louisa Rose Allen) sang the hook on Zedd's pristine EDM super-hit "Clarity" but has struggled for solo momentum. After listening to All I Need for the first time,…” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Lisa Henderson | 2/10 | 20 | 2016 | “Debut album ‘Glorious’ saw Foxes toe the line between indie and pop, offering euphoria-doused choruses to satiate the masses, whilst eschewing” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
All I Need in Foxes's catalog
More from Foxes
More Pop from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply