Early reviews. Critics give Morning/Evening an early B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Morning/Evening
So far, 4 of 4 critics liked it.
- Highest 100 Louder Than War
- Lowest 80 Spin, XS Noize and PopMatters
- Career Tied for #2 of Four Tet's 7 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder Than Warby Simon Tucker | 10/10 | 100 | 2015 | “Kieran Hebden aka Four Tet dropped his latest long player on the day of the summer solstice. It's taken him a while to review (for reasons he will explain) but…” |
| Spinby Dan Weiss | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: June 21, 2015Label: TextKieran Hebden is who his 26-year-old compadre Jamie Smith wants to be someday, possibly today.” |
| XS Noizeby Fionn Crossan | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “Kieran Hebden, better known as Four Tet, is the electronic producer who has done it all really. From signing his first record deal aged fifteen performing in the Post-Rock band…” |
| PopMattersby Casey Hardmeyer | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “After the crossover success of his early-2000s breakthrough records Pause and Rounds, Kieran Hebden, AKA Four Tet, hasn’t been afraid to challenge his” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Morning/Evening in Four Tet's catalog
More from Four Tet
← Earlier There Is Love in You (2010)Later → New Energy (2017)
More Electronic from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply