Critics give So Much (For) Stardust a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.
By the numbers: Fall Out Boy's best-reviewed album here since From Under the Cork Tree (2005). 8 of 9 critics liked it, with Exclaim! the lone holdout at 70.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIY via Wikipediaby Sarah Jamieson | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2023 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4.2/5 | 84 | “Fall Out Boy – So Much (For) Stardust review: Detox just to retox.” | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Steven Loftin | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “A palpable, radiating carefree joy, So Much (For) Stardust is Fall Out Boy sounding more true to themselves than ever before while remaining a big band with even bigger ideas” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Erica Campbell | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Fall Out Boy's first album in five years brings the bombast with none of the pretense, showing that the pop punk stalwarts have truly evolved” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Dillon Eastoe | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “So Much (For) Stardust by Fall Out Boy · released 24th March 2023 · via Fueled By Ramen · 15 tracks · album profile · plus 20 related Dork coverage…” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Nick Ruskell | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Fall Out Boy go back to their roots on superb eighth album So Much (For) Stardust – but not like you think…” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Shannon Garner | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ian Gormely | 7/10 | 70 | 2023 | “Your daily dose of the best music, film and comedy news, reviews, streams, concert listings, interviews and other exclusives on Exclaim!” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Fall Out Boy
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply