Early reviews. Critics give Persona Non Grata an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Persona Non Grata
4 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Metal Temple and Sonic Perspectives
- Lowest 60 Kerrang!
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Exodus's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Goliath (78).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Temple | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “Initially set for release in the summer of 2021, the seminal bay area thrash metal band EXODUS released their eleventh full-length studio album "Persona Non Grata" on November 19, 2021.…” |
| Sonic Perspectives via Wikipediaby Jonathan Smith | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2021 | “The banner of discontent flies high. Long breaks in output can often signal a career that is winding down, but nothing could be further from the truth in the case…” |
| Northern Transmissionsby Jahmeel Russell | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2021 | “Persona Non Grata By Exodus Album review by Jahmeel Russell. The band's new release drops on November 19, via Nuclear Blast” |
| Distorted Soundby Tim Bolitho-Jones | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | “Tim Bolitho-Jones reviews the new album from thrash metal legends Exodus.” |
| Louder via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | |
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Persona Non Grata in Exodus's catalog
How these critics usually treat Exodus
- Metal Temple About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Exodus's other albums (3).
More from Exodus
More Metal & Punk from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply